HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bauer, E. P. Articles by Klovekorn, W. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bauer, E. P. Articles by Klovekorn, W. P.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 10, 248-252, Copyright © 1996 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

ARTICLES

Valve surgery combined with coronary artery operation: is the use of internal mammary artery a predictor for early complications?

EP Bauer, M Schonburg, T Schwarz, A Piepho and WP Klovekorn
Max-Planck-Institute for Clinical and Physiological Research, Kerckhoff Clinic, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

The internal mammary artery (IMA) provides better early and long-term patency than venous grafts do. Although IMA is the conduit of choice in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), its use in combined procedures is not routine in some cardiovascular units. During a 16- month period, 188 patients underwent valve surgery combined with CABG. Internal mammary grafts were used in 68/188 (36%) patients (group 1) and vein grafts without arterial grafts (group 2) in 120/188 (64%). Left IMA was implanted in 67/68 (99%) and right IMA in 1/68 1%) cases. Surgeon A used IMA in 28/44 (64%), surgeon B in 20/32 (63%), surgeon C in 18/44 (41%), surgeon D in 1/4 (25%) and surgeon E in 1/63 (2%) patients. The final decision to use IMA in a combined procedure was left up to the surgeon. Statistically, the preoperative- and perioperative data were identical in the two groups, although the frequency of IMA grafting in patients with double valve replacement and reoperation was lower (1/68 vs 11/120, ns, and 3/68 vs 9/120, ns). Ten of 188 (5.3%) patients died within 30 days after operation. Longer cross-clamp time (P = 0.008) and mitral valve replacement (P = 0.05) were independent risk factors for early death. The use of IMA did not increase the risk of early mortality. The postoperative variables were similar in the IMA and vein groups, in particular data suggesting perioperative myocardial infarction (CK-MB, catecholamine support). Postoperative mechanical ventilation was longer in the IMA group, although not significantly (P = 0.06). Early mortality and morbidity were identical in the two groups in combined procedures. We did not find any hints for an increased risk of using IMA in this type of surgery. Internal mammary artery implantation is safe in selected patients undergoing combined valve and CABG surgery. Beside the better long-term patency of IMA, its use may have several technical advantages.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. K. Smith, M. Carrier, J. C. Chen, A. Haverich, J. H. Levy, P. Menasche, S. K. Shernan, F. Van de Werf, P. X. Adams, T. G. Todaro, et al. Effect of pexelizumab in coronary artery bypass graft surgery with extended aortic cross-clamp time. Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 781 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Karthik, A. K. Srinivasan, A. D. Grayson, T. Friede, and B. M. Fabri Effect of the Left Internal Mammary Artery to the Left Anterior Descending Artery on Mortality and Morbidity After Combined Coronary and Valve Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]