HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baldwin, J. T. Articles by Sauter, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Baldwin, J. T. Articles by Sauter, J.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 11, 287-292, Copyright © 1997 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

ARTICLES

Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve

JT Baldwin, A Campbell, C Luck, W Ogilvie and J Sauter
CarboMedics, Austin, Texas 78752-1793, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare hydrodynamic characteristics of a new bileaflet heart valve, the CarboMedics kinetic cardiac valve prosthesis, with those of a St. Jude Medical (SJM) heart valve. METHODS: Hydrodynamic characteristics were determined in the mitral and aortic positions of a Vivitro Systems pulse duplicator for size 23 Kinetic aortic values, size 23 SJM aortic valves, size 29 Kinetic mitral valves and size 29 SJM mitral valves. Test conditions were 72 beats per min with cardiac outputs of 2, 5 and 7 l/min. Values of forward flow pressure drop (delta P), regurgitant and energy loss were determined for each valve. The test results for the two valve designs were compared by valve size. RESULTS: The test results show that both the size 23 and size 29 Kinetic valves have 8-14% lower delta P values and 5-10% greater effective orifice area (EOA) values. The size 29 Kinetic mitral valve has a 1-2 ml lower regurgitant volume, while the size 23 Kinetic aortic valve has a 0.5 ml greater regurgitant volume than the corresponding SJM values. These factors combine to provide a 5-10% lower energy loss for size 23 Kinetic aortic valves and a 15-25% lower energy loss for size 29 Kinetic mitral valves over the cardiac cycle than for corresponding sizes of SJM valves. CONCLUSIONS: The Kinetic valve's fluid dynamics are superior to equivalent sizes of SJM valves. This is especially impressive considering that the tissue annulus diameters for Kinetic valves are approximately 0.5 mm less than equivalent size SJM valves. The primary reasons for the superior hydrodynamic performance of Kinetic valves are (1) the larger orifices which result in lower forward flow delta P values and (2) the opening angles, which have been customized for each valve size to minimize energy loss.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Machler, M. Perthel, G. Reiter, U. Reiter, M. Zink, P. Bergmann, A. Waltensdorfer, and J. Laas Influence of bileaflet prosthetic mitral valve orientation on left ventricular flow--an experimental in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 26(4): 747 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]