HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gaudino, M. Articles by Goffin, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gaudino, M. Articles by Goffin, Y.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 11, 676-681, Copyright © 1997 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

ARTICLES

Are pulmonary homografts subjected to pulmonary hypertension more appropriate for aortic valve replacement than normal pulmonary homografts? Results of echocardiography in a multicentric study

M Gaudino, T Van Geldorp, W Daenen, P Kalmar and Y Goffin
European Homograft Bank, Brussels, Belgium.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the function in aortic position of cryopreserved pulmonary homografts subjected to pulmonary hypertension with that of normal cryopreserved pulmonary homografts. METHODS: Pulmonary valves (52) were implanted in aortic position in different cardiothoracic centres. The valves were classified as follows: Group I-pulmonary hypertension (procured from recipients of heart/heart-lung transplantation, 31 valves), Group II-normal pulmonary pressure (procured from cadavers and multiorgan donors, 21 valves). Regular echocardiographic follow-up was obtained by the implanting centers. Significant echo changes were defined as insufficiency > 2+ and/or stenosis producing a delta P > 30 mm Hg. RESULTS: Pulmonary homografts showed the following significant echo changes: in the Pulmonary Hypertension Group, 7, 27 and 33% at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively; in the normal PA Group 10, 37.5 and 80% at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. In both groups the most common echocardiographic alteration was homograft insufficiency rather than stenosis. Thus, pulmonary homografts subjected to long-term pulmonary hypertension have significantly less echo changes than normal pulmonary homografts, especially after 12 months (chi 2: P < 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pulmonary valves subjected to pulmonary hypertension might be more appropriate than normal pulmonary homograft for aortic valve replacement, constituting a possible alternative in case of lack of aortic valve homografts. However, the failure of two out of five valves in the longer term must dictate caution while waiting further long-term results.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. R. Koolbergen, M. G. Hazekamp, E. de Heer, F. van Hoorn, H. A. Huysmans, J. A. Bruijn, and R. A.E. Dion Structural degeneration of pulmonary homografts used as aortic valve substitute underlines early graft failure Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 22(5): 802 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Choudhary, A. Saxena, B. Dubey, and A. S. Kumar Pulmonary homograftShould it be used in the aortic position? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2000; 120(1): 148 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Jashari, B. Van Hoeck, M. Gaudino, W. Daenen, T. Van Geldorp, P. Kalmar, and Y. Goffin Are pulmonary homografts which were subjected to pulmonary hypertension more appropriate for aortic valve replacement than normal pulmonary homografts? A long-term multicentric echography study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 17(2): 140 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]