HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liebold, A. Articles by Birnbaum, D. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Liebold, A. Articles by Birnbaum, D. E.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 11, 722-727, Copyright © 1997 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

ARTICLES

Clinical results with single lead VDD pacing

A Liebold, J Merk, C Keyl, H Aebert and DE Birnbaum
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Universitat Regensburg, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with atrioventricular block single lead atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (VDD) may have advantages compared to conventional dual chamber pacing (DDD) since it eliminates the need for an atrial lead. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical performance of a novel VDD pacemaker and the reliability of atrial sensing via the "floating' atrial electrode. METHODS: 31 patients (10 females; age 64 +/- 13 years) underwent an implantation of a VDD pacemaker system (Intermedics UNITY). The patients were analyzed with regard to implantation parameters, complications and postoperative atrial sensing performance using the diagnostic data of the pacemaker memory. The mean follow-up was 6.3 (1-18) months. RESULTS: The implantation procedure did not differ from that of conventional single chamber pacemakers. Dislocation of a ventricular electrode was the only complication observed. The P wave at implantation was 1.6 +/- 0.9 mV and dropped to 0.9 +/- 0.4 mV at predischarge. During follow-up the atrial sensing threshold remained stable. The atrial sensing performance (percentage of atrial synchronous ventricular complexes) after reprogramming the highest atrial sensitivity was 99.7%. Two patients (6%) developed atrial fibrillation. 29 patients (94%) remained in VDD mode as primarily intended. CONCLUSIONS: From these results it is concluded that VDD pacing represents an excellent alternative in patients with atrioventricular block and intact sinus node function. The atrial sensing was found to be reliable.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Zupan, L. Lipar, D. Zizek, W. Boute, M. Vidmar, T. Gabrijelcic, P. Rakovec, and A. Brecelj Retrospective analysis of mode survival, reliability of atrial sensing and incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in 307 single-lead VDD pacemaker patients Europace, October 1, 2006; 8(10): 855 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]