EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacArthur, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rodger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacArthur, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rodger, R.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 2, 143-150, Copyright © 1988 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Mechanical versus biological heart valves: a ten-year comparison in a single centre

KJ MacArthur, WH Bain, MA Turner, KG Davidson, GA Berg, S Nashef and R Rodger
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.

Between January 1977 and December 1986, 1606 Bjork-Shiley tilting disc prostheses (BS) and 1346 Carpentier Edwards porcine prostheses (CE) were implanted in 1300 and 1156 patients, respectively, at the same institution. During the time of implantation, both valves have developed: the BS through standard disc and convexo-concave to monostrut, and the CE valves from standard to supra-annular. Newer valve types were used where applicable as they became available. Preoperative status in respect of age and cardiac rhythm were similar. There were significantly more females (64% BS: 54% CE, P less than 0.001); worse NYHA grade (74% Grade 111 and IV-BS: 56% 111 and IV-CE, P less than 0.001) more closed heart surgery (26% BS: 18% CE, P less than 0.001) and more previous open heart surgery (11.6% BS: 8.9% CE, P less than 0.001) in the BS group. All BS patients were anticoagulated and 49% of mitral CE patients and 7% of aortic CE patients were anticoagulated. There was no significant difference between the two groups in hospital mortality (BS 7.2%: CE 6.3%), late mortality (BS 2.5%/patient year: CE 3.2%/patient year) overall incidence of systemic embolism (BS 1.3%/patient year: CE 1.4/patient year), prosthetic valve endocarditis (BS 0.7%/patient year: CE 0.9%/patient year), valve failure (BS 0.5%/patient year: CE 0.9%/patient year) or peri-prosthetic leak (BS 1.2%/patient year: CE 1.3%/patient year). The incidence of systemic embolism in the aortic position was lower with the BS prosthesis (BS 0.2%/patient year: CE 1.2%/patient year, P less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. D. Glower, W. D. White, A. C. Hatton, L. R. Smith, W. G. Young, W. G. Wolfe, and J. E. Lowe
Determinants of reoperation after 960 valve replacements with Carpentier-Edwards prostheses
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1994; 107(2): 381 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. E. Hammermeister, G. K. Sethi, W. G. Henderson, C. Oprian, T. Kim, S. Rahimtoola, and The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular
A Comparison of Outcomes in Men 11 Years after Heart-Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Valve or Bioprosthesis
N. Engl. J. Med., May 6, 1993; 328(18): 1289 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1988 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.