|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:515-520
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL
Department of Surgery and Bioengineering, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Unit, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 1, 53100 Siena, Italy
Received 14 March 2004; received in revised form 15 May 2004; accepted 17 May 2004.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-0577-585-730-1; fax: +39-0577-586-168
e-mail: scolletta{at}unisi.it
Objective: A less-invasive method has been developed that may provide an alternative to monitor cardiac output from arterial pressure: beat-to-beat values of cardiac output can be obtained by pressure recording analytical method (PRAM). The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of cardiac output determination by PRAM in cardiac surgery. Methods: Cardiac output was measured in 28 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at 15 min after anaesthesia induction, 30 min after extracorporeal circulation, 1 and 3 h after arrival in the intensive care unit using thermodilution (ThD) method through a pulmonary artery catheter and PRAM. ThD cardiac output was calculated as the mean of five separate measurements. PRAM provided beat-by-beat cardiac output data continuously throughout the study and the cardiac output values displayed on a dedicated personal computer at each time point were recorded. Correlations were calculated and differences were compared by BlandAltman analysis. Results: A total of 112 measurements were obtained. Cardiac output ranged from 2.3 to 7.4 l/min, and a good linear correlation (R2=0.78, P<0.0001) was found between ThD and PRAM. The highest degree of correlation (R2=0.86) was obtained at 3 h after arrival in the intensive care unit. The lower degree of correlation (R2=0.70) was obtained 30 min after extracorporeal circulation. At BlandAltman analysis, the overall estimates of cardiac output measured by PRAM closely agreed with ThD (mean difference, 0.027; standard deviation, 0.43; limits of agreement, 0.83 and +0.89). Conclusions: Under the studied conditions, our results demonstrate good agreement between PRAM data and ThD measurements, and this new method has shown to be accurate for real-time monitoring of cardiac output in cardiac surgery. Further studies will be required to assess this method in higher-risk patients and in the setting of haemodynamic instability or arrhythmias. This is the first study designed to assess the accuracy of PRAM in cardiac surgery.
Key Words: Cardiac output Monitoring Pulse contour Coronary artery bypass grafting
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Scolletta, I. D Gregoric, L. Muzzi, B. Radovancevic, and O H. Frazier Pulse wave analysis to assess systemic blood flow during mechanical biventricular support Perfusion, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 63 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M Romano, S. Scolletta, I. Olivotto, B. Biagioli, G. F. Gensini, M. Chiostri, and P. Giomarelli Systemic arterial waveform analysis and assessment of blood flow during extracorporeal circulation Perfusion, March 1, 2006; 21(2): 109 - 116. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Scolletta, S. M. Romano, B. Biagioli, G. Capannini, and P. Giomarelli Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2005; 95(2): 159 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |