HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Richard Raffoul Ulrik Hvass Patrick R. Nataf Permission Requests Google Scholar Articles by Joudinaud, T. M. Articles by Nataf, P. R. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Joudinaud, T. M. Articles by Nataf, P. R. Related Collections Cardiac - other Valve disease

Redo aortic root surgery for failure of an aortic homograft is a major technical challenge

^a Hôpital Bichat, Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France
^b Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital du Taaone, BP 1640, Papeete, Tahiti, France

Received 11 October 2007; received in revised form 28 January 2008; accepted 31 January 2008.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 1 40 25 80 80; fax: +33 1 40 25 80 80. (Email: Thomas.joudinaud{at}bch.aphp.fr).

Objective: Aortic homografts offer many advantages over prosthetic valves. However, homograft dysfunction due to degeneration or infection may lead to reoperation. Aortic valve replacement in patients who have undergone previous aortic root replacement with an aortic homograft remains a technical challenge. To assess reoperation events a retrospective review was conducted. Materials and methods: From January 2000 to October 2006, 20 consecutive patients (38.8 ± 14.9 years old) underwent repeat surgery for aortic homograft failure. Results: Reoperation was performed 7.2 ± 3.5 years after implantation of the aortic homograft as a root. Indication was homograft degeneration (n = 18 [90%]) and endocarditis (n = 2 [10%]). In patients with major homograft wall calcifications or endocarditis, nine aortic root reconstructions were performed (Bentall procedure n = 7; homograft implantation n = 2). Each homograft was dissected with electrical cauterization and removed ‘en-bloc’ sparing the coronary buttons. In case of flexible homograft wall, stented prostheses (mechanical n = 10, bioprosthesis n = 1) were implanted along the homograft annulus. Additional procedures consisted of mitral valve replacements (n = 8), tricuspid repairs (n = 4), Konno procedure (n = 1) and coronary bypass (n = 5). Perioperative complications occurred in seven (35%) patients: sternal re-entry accident (n = 2); reoperations for mediastinitis (n = 1) or bleeding (n = 2); renal insufficiency (n = 1); total heart block (n = 1). No association was found between operative procedures and postoperative complications (Fisher's exact test). Two patients (10%) died from multiorgan failure in the early postoperative period. In total, 94.4% of the survivors remained free from reoperation at 74 months. Conclusion: Reoperation on patients with an aortic homograft as a root presents a relatively high perioperative morbidity. The surgical strategy depends on the degree of homograft wall calcification.

Key Words: Homograft • Redo surgery • Valve disease • Aortic valve • Surgical technique