EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:55-61. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.051
Copyright © 2008, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Burkhardt Seifert
Marko I. Turina
Michele Genoni
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berdajs, D.
Right arrow Articles by Genoni, M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berdajs, D.
Right arrow Articles by Genoni, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias
Right arrow Valve disease

Incidence and pathophysiology of atrioventricular block following mitral valve replacement and ring annuloplasty

Denis Berdajsa,*, Ulrich P. Schurra, Antonia Wagnera, Burkhardt Seifertb, Marko I. Turinaa, Michele Genonia

a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
b Biostatistics Unit ISPM, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Received 27 August 2007; received in revised form 12 March 2008; accepted 31 March 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +41 44 255 11 11; fax: +41 44 255 44 46. (Email: denis.berdajs{at}bluewin.ch).

Background: In this retrospective study we evaluate the causative mechanisms underlying postoperative atrioventricular block (AVB) following mitral valve replacement and mitral valve annuloplasty. Methods: Between January 1990 and December 2003, 391 patients underwent mitral valve replacement or ring annuloplasty and quadrangular resection. Exclusion criteria were preoperative AV block, two or three valvular procedures, reoperations and procedures combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. The presence of the postoperative AVB was compared with preoperative and intraoperative variables. On 55 post-mortem specimens the relationship between the AV node, AV node artery and mitral valve annulus was investigated. Results: The mean age was 59 ± 14 years and 44% of patients were female. Postoperatively AVB occurred in 92 (23.5%) patients. AVB III was found in 17 (4%) patents, in whom a pacemaker was implanted within median interval of 4 days. Second degree AVB occurred and first degree AVB in five (1.3%) and in 70 (18%) patients respectively. In dry dissected human hearts in 23% of investigated cases the AV node artery was discovered to run close to the annulus of the mitral valve. Conclusions: Data collected in this study showed that, sotalol and amiodarone as well as a prolonged cross-clamp time may slightly influence the 23% incidence of postoperative AVB. The morphological investigation showed that the AV node artery runs in close proximity to the annulus in 23% of cases. We speculate that damage of the AV node artery may play a role in development of AVB.

Key Words: Mitral valve surgery • Mitral valve reconstruction • Postoperative rhythm disturbances • Atrioventricular block • Heart conducting system







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.