EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Click here to read this article as a CME activity


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:914-918. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.06.017
Copyright © 2009, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Giuseppe Cardillo
Luigi Carbone
Marco Di Martino
Massimo Martelli
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardillo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Martelli, M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cardillo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Martelli, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pleura

Chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema: comparative merits of thoracoscopic versus open decortication

Giuseppe Cardilloa,*, Francesco Carleoa, Luigi Carbonea, Marco Di Martinoa, Lorenzo Salvadoria, Lea Petrellab, Massimo Martellia

a Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Carlo Forlanini Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy
b Department of Studi Geoeconomici, Linguistici, Statistici, Storici per l’Analisi Regionale, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Received 16 February 2009; received in revised form 23 May 2009; accepted 12 June 2009.

* Corresponding author. Address: Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Carlo Forlanini Hospital, Via Portuense 332, 00149 Rome, Italy. Tel.: +39 06 55180681; fax: +39 06 6638734. (Email: gcardillo{at}scamilloforlanini.rm.it).

Objective: We seek to evaluate the comparative merits of thoracoscopic versus open decortication in the surgical management of patients with chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema. Methods: From January 1996 to December 2006, 308 patients (180 males, 128 females, mean age: 56.3 years, range: 17–82 years) with chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema underwent decortication after failure of conservative treatment. Results: Decortication was performed by open thoracotomy in 123 (39.9%) patients (OT) and by videothoracoscopy (VT) in 185 (60.1%). Mortality was 1.29% (4/308). Morbidity was 21.1% (65/308). At 6 months follow-up, three VT patients showed recurrent empyema and underwent re-do surgery by video-assisted-thoracoscopy (VATS) (one patient) or by thoracotomy (two patients). The videothoracoscopic approach showed statistically significant better results in terms of in-hospital postoperative (day 1 and day 7), pain (p < 0.0001), postoperative air leak (p = 0.004), operative time (p < 0.0001), hospital stay (p = 0.020) and time to return to work (p < 0.0001). The analysis of postoperative pain at 6 months follow-up showed no significant differences among the different groups. Conclusions: In the light of our experience, videothoracoscopic decortication appears to be the surgical treatment of choice for chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema even if a multicentric-randomised trial should be performed before videothoracoscopic decortication becomes the gold standard for the treatment of pleural empyema.

Abbreviations: VATS = video-assisted-thoracoscopy • CH = Charrier

Key Words: Empyema • Thoracoscopic surgery • Pleural diseases







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.