EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:875-876. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.015
Copyright © 2009, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thierry Carrel
Lars Englberger
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Englberger, L.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carrel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Englberger, L.

Editorial comment

Thierry Carrel*, Lars Englberger

Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Berne, Berne, Switzerland

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +41 31 632 23 75; fax: +41 31 632 44 43. (Email: thierry.carrel@insel.ch).

Key Words: Aprotinin • Cardiac surgery • Mortality • Late survival

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Stamou and colleagues present another critical article about adverse outcome following administration of aprotinin in adult cardiac surgery [1]. In this retrospective study, haemostatic effects of aprotinin were confirmed but the authors found an increased risk for in-hospital cardiac arrest. Another intriguing finding was found, namely that the risk of late cardiac death was higher in patients who received aprotinin than after aminocaproic acid (EACA). Unfortunately, neither the cause of early mortality nor the problem of cardiac-related attrition (graft occlusion, perioperative myocardial infarction, malignant arrhythmias or others) were analysed or specified.

Because of the retrospective character of the study, several limitations and bias have to be considered: the use of aprotinin or EACA was left at the discretion of the surgeons. The patients who . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.